A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst prospective neighbours about the construction of a wall at a coastal web-site inside a north Dublin suburb, a situation which includes captivated national consideration next an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of planning breaches, environmental issues, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Periods article about René Collier and also the Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a very publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction functions at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, request to make their spouse and children dwelling. The situation has grown to be emblematic of broader disputes along Ireland’s coastline, where by enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of recognized citizens. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying made by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath arranging authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally residents of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their setting up permission by creating a wall beyond the boundaries in their website, bringing about an encroachment on the Special Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result locations are subject matter to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have Long lasting ecological penalties, specifically in a sensitive coastal ecosystem for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their organizing permission, and say the wall, and that is partially built, is in the right position. Their authorized group has characterised the motion as an try to hold off or frustrate a lawful advancement. The pair accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding to be able to protect their see, an allegation that's been recurring in court docket and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal preparing disputes, wherever sights of the sea are equally really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary efforts through the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the website, As outlined by sworn proof referenced in the Irish Occasions. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, a picture which has because become emblematic with the intensity of the dispute. These steps were not simply symbolic; they had been meant to Collect Visible evidence with the wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site with the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two Adult men entered the water through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become one of the most hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that this sort of actions had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a place impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was being encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included intimately from the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 turned widely searched phrases as readers sought to comprehend the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders should be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant in the lawful timeline.
Within the Main on the dispute can be a disagreement in excess of boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep the wall, as built, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, is described as meticulous in his assessment of arranging paperwork, maps, and circumstances hooked up for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that René Collier their action is motivated by worry for environmental safety and adherence to planning legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal look at, insisting as an alternative that it's about making certain that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got explained their extended-standing relationship to the realm as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a pair simply just wanting to build a loved ones house in accordance with the law. They deny that the wall encroaches over a Particular Place of Conservation and say that all performs are completed depending on Skilled tips and authorized designs. Their legal professionals have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the remarkable steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering The ocean all through a storm, will not change the underlying details.
The case has also elevated broader questions on how preparing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about design of wall at coastal web page has become a shorthand description for any circumstance that lots of observers see as ever more prevalent. As sea degrees increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation in between private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is now far more contentious.
The Irish Instances write-up about René Collier noted which the businessman had previously been involved with regional advocacy on organizing and environmental issues, although not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct Experienced backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Periods protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waist-substantial h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by midsection-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in coverage, reflecting each the Bodily fact with the coastline and the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an abnormal tactic.
As being the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom have to ascertain whether or not the wall as designed complies with scheduling authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Distinctive Space of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and preparing circumstances. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who have to Dwell alongside one another prolonged after the lawful expenditures are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development operates at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation lengthen beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how speedily an area disagreement can escalate when basic challenges including environmental security and house legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of pure attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre from the dispute stands partially designed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal queries. Irrespective of whether it's going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or accomplished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to one of the most intently viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.